 |
2005 Fall ->Web Page Design ->Good Bad Critique
| | | Good Bad Critique Assignment | | | | | Title | Good Bad Critique | | Due Date | Friday 30 September 2005 before 6:00 PM | | Points | 10 | | Preparation | Review Good Bad URL's | | Venue | External to lecture. | | Connection | Individual work | | Turn-in Method | Email | | Format | Email critique form. | | Subject Line | APCG 360 Good Bad Critique - your name | | File Name | Good_Bad_Critique_your_name | | Notes | Save your critique (see below) as either a text file or a Word document and email it as an attachment to the instructor by 6 PM Friday 30 September 2005 with the subject line APCG 360 Good Bad Critique - your name. ranger@ecst.csuchico.edu |
| |
|
| | Task:
Keeping in mind the web page criteria we have discussed in lecture:
Purpose, Content, Audience, Navigation, Speed, Style, and Maintenance, review at least 10 of the 'good' and 10 of the 'bad' web pages submitted by your fellow students. With these points in mind, for your review:
1. The 'Best' of the 'Good':
a. State which 'Good' pages you feel is best:
b. Explain* briefly how this page addresses the criteria.
c. What areas could be improved?
2. The 'Worst' of the 'Bad':
a. State which 'Bad' pages you feel is worst:
b. Explain* briefly how this page addresses the criteria.
c. What area(s) actually work?
3. Using the site you selected as 'best':
a. Indicate* how you would improve the site's purpose, content or attention to its audience.
b. Indicate* how you would improve the site's navigation, speed or style.
c. Indicate* how you, as the webmaster for this site, would be able to easily maintain the site.
*A brief written statement -- a paragraph or two; not pages and not just a single sentence.
Save your critique (see below) as either a text file or a Word document and email it as an attachment to the instructor by 6 PM Friday 30 September 2005 with the subject line APCG 360 Good Bad Critique - your name. ranger@ecst.csuchico.edu
| |
|
|
|
 
|
|
.
Developed by Diverse Network Associates, Inc. 
.