Applied
Computer
Graphics

Assignments
APCG 491 Portfolio Spring 2010
Ranger's Home
 Clarke Steinback Ph.D.
Ranger's Home   Classes  Portfolio  Assignments 
Formal Presentation Evalution Criteria   
DateDay of WeekTaskAssignment 
29-Jan-10FridayOutline of Tasks  
4-Feb-10ThursdayCatalog Spreadsheet, Organization & TargetPortfolio Catalog 
5-Feb-10FridayReview Catalogs, Organization & Target  
12-Feb-10FridayCatalog Spreadsheet, Organization & TargetPre-CritiqueFurlough Day
19-Feb-10FridayFirst Look & Feel for Home PageFirst Look & Feel - Home PageAlpha
26-Feb-10FridayFirst Look & Feel for Home PageRevised Portfolio CatalogOmega
5-Mar-10FridaySite Look & Feel - Home, Secondary and GallerySite Look & FeelAlpha
12-Mar-10FridaySite Look & Feel - Home, Secondary and Gallery Omega
19-Mar-10FridaySpring Break  
26-Mar-10FridayCritiquesCritique 
2-Apr-10FridayRevised Home, Secondary, and GalleryRevised Site Look & FeelAlpha
9-Apr-10FridayRevised Home, Secondary, and Gallery Omega
16-Apr-10FridayImplementation ProgressOn-Line DemoAlpha
23-Apr-10FridayImplementation Progress Omega
30-Apr-10FridayFurlough Furlough Day
7-May-10FridayImplementation Progress  
14-May-10FridayFormal Presentation - FridayFinal Portfolio Site 
17-May-10MondayFormal Presentation - Monday  
21-May-10FridayFinal CritiquesCritiques 

Formal Presentation Evalution CriteriaTop of Page

AttributesUnacceptableMarginalAcceptableExceptional
Organization & StructureNot possible to understand presentation due to absence of structure.Difficult to follow presentation due to erratic topical shifts and jumps.Most information presented in logical order which is easy to followAll information is presented in a logical, interesting, and novel sequence, which is easily followed.
Content & KnowledgeNo grasp of information. Unable to answer questions about the subject.Uncomfortable with information. Capable only of answering rudimentary questions.At ease with content and able to elaborate and explain to some degree.Demonstration of full knowledge of the subject with explanations and elaboration.
Visual Aids & NeatnessNo visual aids.Occasional use of visual aids, however they barely support text or presentation. Several misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.Visual aids are related to text and presentation. Minor misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.Text and presentation are reinforced by the use of visual aids. Negligible misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.
Voice volume, enunciation, speedUnintelligibleVoice hard to hear, words slurred or voice trails off, spoke too slow or too fast, monotone with little emphasisVoice clearly heard, words clearly enunciated, did not speak to slowly or too rapidlyVoice projected very well, clear enunciation, did not speak too slowly or rapidly
Hesitations, other voice habitsPresentation full of hesitations, ums, ahs, etc.Some hesitations, ums, ahs, etc.Clear, continuous presentation, perhaps a few ums, ahs, etc.Superior presentation, free of ums, ahs, etc.
Distracting mannerismsPresentation full of distracting mannerisms such as giggling or chewing gumSome distracting mannerismsNo distracting mannerismsSuperior presentation
Maintaining eye contactNo eye contact with audience at allPoor eye contact, looking down or at screen significant portion of timeMaintained eye contact other than quick glances at screenMaintained eye contact with all segments of the audience
PoiseClearly unsure, nervous, confusedAt times appears unsure nervous, confusedComposed at all timesExudes/convey confidence
Body languageImmobile, hands in pockets, or blocked screenDid not always indicate how material on the screen was related to presentationConsistently used gestures to coordinate oral and visual presentationExcellent use gestures to provide emphasis
Presentation LengthFar too short or too long.Somewhat too short or too long.Acceptable length.Presentation meets specifications exactly.
Overall Rating    
Gallery Ideas in Flash

http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/10/12/flash-based-galleries-for-your-images/