Ranger's Home
 Clarke Steinback Ph.D.
3D Computer Modeling
APCG 330 Spring 2006
Final Project Presentation
2006 Spring ->3D Computer Modeling ->Final Project Presentation
Evaluation Criteria   
Final Project Presentation

Task:     Individually present your scene  
 
Due:     In lab Wednesday 10 or Thursday 11 May 2006 (depending upon your lab assignment).  

Points:    40

Evaluation CriteriaTop of Page

AttributesUnacceptableMarginalAcceptableExceptional
Organization & StructureNot possible to understand presentation due to absence of structure.Difficult to follow presentation due to erratic topical shifts and jumps.Most information presented in logical order which is easy to followAll information is presented in a logical, interesting, and novel sequence, which is easily followed.
Content & KnowledgeNo grasp of information. Unable to answer questions about the subject.Uncomfortable with information. Capable only of answering rudimentary questions.At ease with content and able to elaborate and explain to some degree.Demonstration of full knowledge of the subject with explanations and elaboration.
Visual Aids & NeatnessNo visual aids.Occasional use of visual aids, however they barely support text or presentation. Several misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.Visual aids are related to text and presentation. Minor misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.Text and presentation are reinforced by the use of visual aids. Negligible misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.
Voice volume, enunciation, speedUnintelligibleVoice hard to hear, words slurred or voice trails off, spoke too slow or too fast, monotone with little emphasisVoice clearly heard, words clearly enunciated, did not speak to slowly or too rapidlyVoice projected very well, clear enunciation, did not speak too slowly or rapidly
Hesitations, other voice habitsPresentation full of hesitations, ums, ahs, etc.Some hesitations, ums, ahs, etc.Clear, continuous presentation, perhaps a few ums, ahs, etc.Superior presentation, free of ums, ahs, etc.
Distracting mannerismsPresentation full of distracting mannerisms such as giggling or chewing gumSome distracting mannerismsNo distracting mannerismsSuperior presentation
Maintaining eye contactNo eye contact with audience at allPoor eye contact, looking down or at screen significant portion of timeMaintained eye contact other than quick glances at screenMaintained eye contact with all segments of the audience
PoiseClearly unsure, nervous, confusedAt times appears unsure nervous, confusedComposed at all timesExudes/convey confidence
Body languageImmobile, hands in pockets, or blocked screenDid not always indicate how material on the screen was related to presentationConsistently used gestures to coordinate oral and visual presentationExcellent use gestures to provide emphasis
Presentation LengthFar too short or too long.Somewhat too short or too long.Acceptable length.Presentation meets specifications exactly.
Overall Rating