| Keeping in mind the web page criteria we have discussed in lecture:
Purpose, Content, Audience, Navigation, Speed, Style, and Maintenance, review at least 10 of the 'good' and 10 of the 'bad' web pages submitted by your fellow students. With these points in mind, from your review:
1. The 'Best' of the 'Good':
a. State which 'Good' pages you feel is best:
b. Explain* briefly how this page addresses the criteria.
c. What areas could be improved?
2. The 'Worst' of the 'Bad':
a. State which 'Bad' pages you feel is worst:
b. Explain* briefly how this page addresses the criteria.
c. What area(s) actually work?
3. Using the site you selected as 'best':
a. Indicate* how you would improve the site's purpose, content or attention to its audience.
b. Indicate* how you would improve the site's navigation, speed or style.
c. Indicate* how you, as the webmaster for this site, would be able to easily maintain the site.
*A brief written statement -- a paragraph or two; not pages and not just a single sentence.
Save your critique as either a text file or a Word document and email it to the instructor by midnight Thursday 30 September 2004 with the subject line CSCI 145 Good/Bad Critique. ranger@ecst.csuchico.edu
| |
