Applied
Computer
Graphics

Tutorial Presentation Frank Pereira's Home
 Frank Pereira
Frank Pereira's Home   Classes  3D Computer Modeling  Tutorial Presentation 
Evaluation Criteria   
Tutorial Presentation

Task:     Individual present of your tutorial  
 
Due:   See schedule below.

Points:    50
DateDayVenueNameTopic
26 March 2007MondayLectureJason Young 
Joshua GabrielArray
David Brooks 
Evan WooleryComposition
  
  
MondayLab  
  
27 March 2007TuesdayLab  
  
02 April 2007MondayLectureChris Funk 
Veng LeeWooden Window
Gary AgejaRail Extrude
  
  
  
MondayLabRamon AguilarBezier Curves, Points to Polys in Making a Treasure Chest
Pablo Barriga 
03 April 2007TuesdayLabSarah Delucchi 
Charles Van Steyn 
09 April 2007MondayLectureTyler Weber 
Andrew Long 
Valerie Rodriguez 
Will Owen 
Nathan Davis 
Kristen Rieger 
Dan SchmittouHDRI Lighting
MondayLabAdam Crowther 
Farm Saechao 
10 April 2007TuesdayLabThomas Uster 
Cole Reibin 
16 April 2007MondayLectureGerry Magana 
Cameron Myers 
Steve Beyers 
Ayla Richards 
Brad Sanders 
Andy RaderRefraction
MondayLabLindsay StallmanMaking a Mirror
Ian Williams 
17 April 2007TuesdayLabTyson Hill 
Andrea HageyRusty Metal Texture
23 April 2007MondayLectureTom RuizTerrain
Erik Sunderland 
Patrick Kelley 
Rylan Utegaard 
  
  
MondayLabShuting Yu 
Danny Murray 
24 April 2007TuesdayLabWes Newell 
David WinstonHDRI
30 April 2007MondayLectureMike Hayward 
Yun Han Chin 
Taylor Allread 
  
  
  
MondayLabJonathon Wondrusch 
Aaron Vipperman 
01 May 2007TuesdayLabTimothy Thao 
  

Evaluation CriteriaTop of Page

AttributesUnacceptableMarginalAcceptableExceptional
Organization & StructureNot possible to understand presentation due to absence of structure.Difficult to follow presentation due to erratic topical shifts and jumps.Most information presented in logical order which is easy to followAll information is presented in a logical, interesting, and novel sequence, which is easily followed.
Content & KnowledgeNo grasp of information. Unable to answer questions about the subject.Uncomfortable with information. Capable only of answering rudimentary questions.At ease with content and able to elaborate and explain to some degree.Demonstration of full knowledge of the subject with explanations and elaboration.
Visual Aids & NeatnessNo visual aids.Occasional use of visual aids, however they barely support text or presentation. Several misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.Visual aids are related to text and presentation. Minor misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.Text and presentation are reinforced by the use of visual aids. Negligible misspellings and/or grammatical errors on visual aids.
Voice volume, enunciation, speedUnintelligibleVoice hard to hear, words slurred or voice trails off, spoke too slow or too fast, monotone with little emphasisVoice clearly heard, words clearly enunciated, did not speak to slowly or too rapidlyVoice projected very well, clear enunciation, did not speak too slowly or rapidly
Hesitations, other voice habitsPresentation full of hesitations, ums, ahs, etc.Some hesitations, ums, ahs, etc.Clear, continuous presentation, perhaps a few ums, ahs, etc.Superior presentation, free of ums, ahs, etc.
Distracting mannerismsPresentation full of distracting mannerisms such as giggling or chewing gumSome distracting mannerismsNo distracting mannerismsSuperior presentation
Maintaining eye contactNo eye contact with audience at allPoor eye contact, looking down or at screen significant portion of timeMaintained eye contact other than quick glances at screenMaintained eye contact with all segments of the audience
PoiseClearly unsure, nervous, confusedAt times appears unsure nervous, confusedComposed at all timesExudes/convey confidence
Body languageImmobile, hands in pockets, or blocked screenDid not always indicate how material on the screen was related to presentationConsistently used gestures to coordinate oral and visual presentationExcellent use gestures to provide emphasis
Presentation LengthFar too short or too long.Somewhat too short or too long.Acceptable length.Presentation meets specifications exactly.
Overall Rating