ANDREA TORRES
LAB
2 : UNIVERSITY MATCHING.![]()
Introduction.
For this lab
I choose to create and expert system that helps the user to determine which
school is the most appropriated to continue his studies. In my first lab,
using CLIPS, I made a program that also helps the user to choose a school
as well, however, in the second lab I re design the project so I can use
completely the toolkit that it was given to us in the class. This toolkit
was a learning experience because allowed it to me to put more knowledge
in the system in a shorter period of time.
In this new
project I classified a student upon his likes and dislikes also, the it
is steed in to a determinate career, place and type of school in which
he can continue his studies, I made this project only for the state of
California to make the project more manageable.
As a result
is much broader than the previous lab, although there are still lacking
in depth of a full production system.
Background Information.
The Visual
Works with the special tool was really new to me, but I found it easier
than CLIPS, It is more understandable and easy to use. The hierarchical
classification system for toolkit, is one of establish and refine, where
a case is fit into the system as a node in the tree. The tree itself has
general specialists at the higher level closest to the root node, and becoming
increasingly more specialized as one traverses down.
Most of my
sources and information were Dr Keunekes web page, trial and error and
also I receive help from Sang my classmate.
Implementation.
Knowledge Representation and Organization.
Using the toolkit
for hierarchical classification, the Information needed to be ordered into
some type of hierarchy, with generalized knowledge at the top or root of
the hierarchy and more detailed items further down. I did this by having
levels of knowledge. For example, the first node wanted to know if you
want to study in the state of California. The second layer, wanted more
information about the GPA for the High school and the amount of money that
you expect to pay. Subsequent layers want to know more about your aptitudes
and preferences so it will set the user in the specific major. A node can
be one of several variable types. Each type has its own format, but there
are some class variables that are the same for all nodes. There was a multivalue
data type, which worked by allowing a set of answers but I was never able
to get it working without crashing, a numerical value which includes a
"unit" type, and a range of acceptable values from lower to upper. OneOfVar
allowed the user to select a value from one of a list of values, where
each value was basically a string. Ordinal values were another variable
that I couldn't get working properly. StringVar accepted a string input.
Lastly, Yes No variables would accept yes, no, or unknown response to the
question.
Control Methodology
The data
is organized into the system and it will run with a control access through
a technique called establish and refine. Control starts at the high level
specialist. The variable associated with that node start. This will pop
up a GUI with the question for that variable, and some mechanism for retrieving
the answer. Each node also has a "table matcher" control.
This is where
the user's answer is matched against possible solutions. If it matches,
the specialist establishes it. Next it will refine by moving to the next
level of the tree. The process is started all over again. The table matcher
included some basic logical operators such as less than, greater than,
equal to, not equal to, etc.
Limitations
The lack of
information make the use of the tool difficult at first, but when you get
use it does a good job. Preventing errors is much better this tool
than Clips but anyways as a developer is difficult to manage all the
information about the domain and be critical in the
hierachycal design.
An example
of a possible error, is that the user is expecting to be set in more academic
options but this was really difficult because increase tremendously the
size of the project.
Scalability
One issue
that is a concern for all systems is scalability. This system is no exception.
The straitest forward way to make this system better is to have more universities
and majors. But having more majors and universities the solution couldn’t
be narrow and if they have 20 suggestions is not going to be useful for
the student.
