 |
"Every time we figure out a piece of it, it stops being magical; we say, Oh, that's just a computation." "As soon as someone gets a computer to do it, people say: 'That's not what we meant by intelligence.' People subconsciously are trying to preserve for themselves some special role in the universe." |
The AI Effect: "The great practical benefits of AI applications and even the existence of AI in many software products go largely unnoticed by many despite the already widespread use of AI techniques in software. This is the AI effect. Many marketing people don't use the term 'artificial intelligence' even when their company's products rely on some AI techniques. Why not?" See what Stottler Henke Associates has to say by reading the rest of the entry for the "AI Effect" in their AI Glossary.
AI: Manufactured Minds. Students: Amelia, Chloe, Chris, Kishore, Laura, & Patrick. Locations: Australia, Singapore, & USA. Coaches: James Poirier &Tina Photakis. ThinkQuest International 2006 2nd Place (19 & Under) and winner of the Global Perspective Award. "As a result of Hollywood's highly imaginative work, many people today fail to recognize the significance of the less mind-blowing, but nonetheless equally important implementations of AI in the world today. This website attempts to redefine the way we look at Artificial Intelligence and helps us to be more appreciative of the numerous benefits that are being brought about by our continued research in this field."
How to identify high-impact future technologies. By Nestor E. Arellano. IT World Canada (October 2, 2006). "So how does one identify high-impact technologies of the future? That's the million dollar question. In fact, the 'right' answer can be worth far more than a million bucks. The challenge is finding it. Some industry insiders believe a review of the popularity cycle that ideas or products go through can provide valuable clues to tech prognosticators. Research firm Gartner Research Inc. has developed what it calls a Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, which is essentially a graph that charts the movement of specific technologies from inception to productivity. ... Much like a movie star, 'every technology goes through a cycle of development, initial awareness, popularity, slump, and if the technology has got what it takes…re-emergence,' said [Leo] Marland during a presentation at the recently concluded 2006 Showcase Ontario in Toronto. ... The introduction of a technology tends to build an expectation about what it could offer to user. If this expectation is not met, [Paul] Johnston said, the technology will probably disappear from the public's radar screen. 'The idea of artificial intelligence, for instance, first appeared in the 1950s, when it was thought day-to-day appliances would somehow become human-like in helping people make decisions.' Johnston noted that the word disappeared until the late 1980's when gadgets such as microwave ovens, computers and VCRs with so called 'built-in intelligence' came out. The Gartner Hype Cycle identifies such a hibernation period as the 'Trough of Disillusionment', when a product fails to meet expectations and becomes unfashionable. Even during this period, some businesses or organizations might continue working on the technology waiting for the time when its benefits and applications are further understood -- the 'Slope of Enlightenment' phase. As a technology evolves to its more stable second and third generations, it hits the 'Plateau of Productivity'. It is at this stage that the technology achieves acceptance either by the broad public or by a niche market."
Robotics
firms find fundraising struggle, with venture capital shy. By Patty
Tascarella. Pittsburgh Business Times (August 11, 2006). "Robotics, one of
the earliest and easiest-to-identify elements of the technology movement
in the United States, is no longer a category in funding reports by the
National Venture Capital Association. NVCA described it as a strategic
realignment. It dropped robotics as a category a few years ago because the
companies fit better within the industry categories they serve, said John
Taylor, director of research at Alexandria, Va.-based NVCA. ... Some
believe the word 'robotics' actually carries a stigma that hurts a
company's chances at funding. 'In many cases, it's a world where the
expectations exceed capabilities, and in many ways, it's a marketing
issue,' said Michael Matesic, CEO of the Idea Foundry Inc. ... 'There's a
preconceived notion of what a robot is, and many of the technologies that
are considered robotic technologies really don't fit that perception. And
that can harm them in the early stages of life.'"
>>> Robots, Applications,
The
AI Effect
-> back to
headlines
AI set to exceed human brain power. CNN.com (July 26, 2006). "Nick Bostrom, Director of the Future of Humanity Institute at the UK's Oxford University, said that AI-inspired systems were already integral to many everyday technologies such as internet search engines, bank software for processing transactions and in medical diagnosis. 'We have seen incremental progress in AI but not yet the great breakthroughs that people were predicting 30 or 40 years ago,' Bostrom told CNN. 'A lot of cutting edge AI has filtered into general applications, often without being called AI because once something becomes useful enough and common enough it's not labelled AI anymore.'"
Take a moment and a raise a glass to the wonderful, underappreciated AI. Andrew Kantor's CyberSpeak column. USAToday.com (June 1, 2006). "AI does more than make better games ... What Far Cry illustrates is how far artificial intelligence has come. It's so sophisticated that we almost dismiss it. In a way, that's a sign of their quality. Invisible tech is often the best tech. ... Because Google doesn't talk like HAL 9000, we don't think of it as AI. Working with its own algorithm and the data input by millions of users every time they search, Google is able to help you find information on the billions of pages of the Web in a matter of seconds. Or less. ... Another example: When I check my e-mail, Thunderbird deletes almost all of the incoming spam. It does this not by looking for obvious spam words, but by using artificial intelligence - in this case Bayesian filtering to create a detailed profile of each message. Based on what it's learned - yes, learned - about the mail I receive, it can tell it how likely any given message is legit. If you drive a modern car, your vehicle's artificial intelligence is doing a lot for you - quietly and behind the scenes, of course. ... So while we're waiting for our computers to have meaningful conversations with us, take a moment to appreciate the underappreciated AI - and be glad its not trying to kill us - much."
Golden Anniversary For AI [podcast]. Dartmouth News: Views from the Green (May 5, 2006). "The field of artificial intelligence was officially named 50 years ago by Dartmouth Professor John McCarthy when he convened the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. In this podcast, philosophy professor Jim Moor discusses the history of AI and some of the philosophical questions he's been thinking about. He also talks about this summers's AI@50 conference, which will be held July 13-15 at Dartmouth."
Promise of AI not so bright. By Fred Reed. The Washington Times (April 14, 2006). "A curious technology that was thought to have great promise but didn't go anywhere -- well, sort of didn't -- is artificial intelligence, or AI. What happened? Why don't we have computers that talk to us about the meaning of art? Is AI nonsense? No, if you are reasonable about it. ... A problem that proponents of AI regularly face is this: When we know how a machine does something 'intelligent,' it ceases to be regarded as intelligent. If I beat the world's chess champion, I'd be regarded as highly bright."
Machines are catching up to human intelligence. By Robert S. Boyd. Knight Ridder Washington Bureau (October 24, 2005). "Some AI systems are famous, such as Deep Blue, the computer that beat the world chess champion Garry Kasparov, or Predators, the unmanned spy planes hovering over Afghanistan. But the machine intelligence that underlies most such systems is largely invisible, so people take their cleverness for granted. AI experts grouse that once one of their projects succeeds, people no longer consider it to be AI. According to Rodney Brooks, the director of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 'AI is everywhere around you every second of the day. People just don't notice it.'"
Behind Artificial Intelligence, a Squadron of Bright Real People. By John Markoff. The New York Times (October 14, 2005). "The five robots that successfully navigated a 132-mile course in the Nevada desert last weekend demonstrated the re-emergence of artificial intelligence, a technology field that for decades has overpromised and underdelivered. At its low point, some computer scientists and software engineers avoided the term artificial intelligence for fear of being viewed as wild-eyed dreamers. ... The feat, which won a $2 million prize from the Pentagon Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, was compared by exuberant Darpa officials to the Wright brothers' accomplishment at Kitty Hawk, because it was clear that it was not a fluke. ... Until recently, progress in artificial intelligence lagged so far behind computing technology that some in the field talked about an 'A.I. winter,' after commercial and government funding evaporated in the mid-1980's. Now there is talk about an A.I. spring among researchers like Sebastian Thrun, the director of the Stanford lab."
AI - the smart way to go. By Paul Hyman. HollywoodReporter.com (August 26, 2005). "Artificial intelligence -- or 'AI' -- is the Rodney Dangerfield of video game design. It gets no respect when it's working great, as when it contributed to 'Halo 2' and 'Half-Life 2' becoming the hugely successful games that they are. But when game characters start walking into walls, everyone knows to blame the AI. According to John Funge, high-quality graphics may be what attracts a player to a game, but it's the AI and the gameplay that holds their attention. ... In a chat with Hollywood Reporter columnist Paul Hyman, Funge talks about why designers ought to think about AI when turning their IP into games, and how AI has the potential to become the new driving force behind video game innovation. ... THR: Would you expect that gamers will recognize this as better AI? Funge: Most likely not. It's sort of a Catch-22. The better the AI gets, the fewer people will recognize it as AI. They'll just see it as realism that gives them a more fun experience."
AI Knows It’s Out There - Artificial intelligence may not be living up to Sci-Fi visions, but it has gone underground into many day-to-day systems. Red Herring (August 22, 2005 print issue). "Many people think of artificial intelligence (AI) as a high-flying 1980s tech concept that crashed and burned back in the early 1990s after a good deal of hype. The fact is, AI technology has become pervasive in much of the software we use today. Take the word processor. Start to write a memo, and your word processor will try to decide which words you really mean to type, and which icons to hide because you rarely use them. Or do an online search, and notice the ads that the search engine displays based on the topics it decides must interest you. 'The big picture is that AI is almost everywhere, but we don't call it such,' says Alex Linden, vice president in the Frankfurt office of research firm Gartner. Turn up your nose at AI and you’ll be ignoring some of the latest technologies and business opportunities. AI experts point to exciting innovations in fields such as machine vision, data mining, and the semantic web, while old-school AI technologies like neural networking and expert systems still soldier on."
Digital Dullard. By Steven Cherry. IEEE Spectrum Online (January 2005). "To be sure, AI has its successes. Factory robots use machine vision to track parts. Automotive suspension systems and camcorders use fuzzy logic to smooth out jarring motions. Hospitals use large knowledge bases of drug effects and interactions to ensure that prescribed drugs don't conflict with one another. Computer programs now repeatedly beat the world's chess champions. Part of AI's image problem stems from the fact that whenever a development moves from lab to market, it's no longer artificial intelligence; it's just software."
AI Revisited - Pieces of the AI Puzzle are Already Deployed, but Much Remains to be Done. Bart Eisenberg's Pacific Connection series in Software Design Magazine (December 2004). "'There's a joke in the AI community that as soon as AI works, it is no longer called AI,' says Sara Hedberg, a spokeswoman for the American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Hedberg, who has written about AI for the past 20 years or so, has done her share of trying to enlighten reporters who are ready to declare AI dead. 'Once a technology leaves the research labs and gets proven, it becomes ubiquitous to the point where it is almost invisible,' she says."
Will AI Reach the Mainstream? Artificial intelligence has so far carried high expectations and little reality, but research slowly carrying through to the business marketplace, says analyst firm. By Jim Ericson. Line56.com.(September 14, 2004). "Computers and software can now perform tasks that were impossible five years ago, so it pays to keep an open mind, according to Amreetha Vijayakumar, Frost & Sullivan Technical Insights research analyst. 'AI is slowly starting to propagate in the normal business case, especially in applications risk assessment, CRM, data mining, these applications are starting to reach users.' ... In some cases she says, AI goes unnoticed because developers don't accept that AI is used in their products."
An apple for the computer - Machines are so sophisticated they can be used to grade essays. But in some ways, artificial intelligence still lacks common sense. By Faye Flam. Philadelphia Inquirer (August 30, 2004). "[Henry] Lieberman and other artificial intelligence researchers say computers could become dramatically smarter and more humanlike in the future. The brain is just a physical machine, albeit a complicated one we don't yet understand, they argue. 'People have this illusion that what we do is magic and it will never be automated,' said University of Pennsylvania computer science professor Lyle Ungar. When he first started studying artificial intelligence, he said, no one thought a computer could play chess well enough to beat the masters. Today, computers can beat everyone at chess, he said, and we're no longer impressed."
Talking to Bill. Interview by Gary Stix. Scientific American (May 24, 2004).[ "On the occasion of the fourth TechFest at Microsoft Research--an event at which researchers demonstrate their work to the company’s product developers--Bill Gates talked with Scientific American’s Gary Stix on topics ranging from artificial intelligence to cosmology to the innate immune system. A slightly edited version of the conversation follows. (An Innovations column on Microsoft Research, accompanied by a shorter version of this interview, appears in the June issue of Scientific American on page 18.)'] "SA: Do you see a continued relevance to the idea of artificial intelligence [AI]? The term is not used very much anymore. Some people say that's because it's ubiquitous, it's incorporated in lots of products. There are plenty of neuroscientists who say that computers are still clueless. BG: And so are neuroscientists, too. No, seriously, we don't understand the plasticity of the neurons. How does that work? There's even this recent proposal that there is, you know, prion-type shaping as part of that plasticity. We don't understand why a neuron behaves differently a day later than before. What is it that the accumulation of signals on it causes? So whenever somebody says to me, 'Oh, this is like a neural network,' well, how can someone say that? We don't really understand exactly what the state function is and even at a given point in time what the input-to-output equation looks like. So there is a part of AI that we're still in the early stages of, which is true learning. Now, there's all these peripheral problems--vision, speech, things like that--that we're making huge progress in. If you just take Microsoft Research alone in those areas, those used to be defined as part of AI. Playing games used to be defined as part of AI. For particular games, it's going pretty well, but we did it without a general theory of learning. And the reason we worked on chess was really not because we needed somebody to play chess with other than humans; it was because we thought it might tell us about general learning.But instead we just did this minimax, high-speed static evaluation, a minimax search on trees. Fine. I am an AI optimist. We've got a lot of work in machine learning, which is sort of the polite term for AI nowadays because it got so broad that it's not that well defined. But the real core piece is this machine-learning work. We have people who do Bayesian models, Support Vector Machines, lots of things that we think will be the foundation of true general-purpose AI."
Artificial intellect remains elusive. By Fred Reed. The Washington Times (April 22, 2004). "Whatever happened to artificial intelligence? There was a time, a couple of decades ago, when computers were expected soon to be able to behave intelligently -- to talk to people in English, answer questions, and make complex decisions. What people really had in mind was an artificial human. HAL, the computer in the movie '2001: A Space Odyssey,' comes to mind. It didn't happen. Today, although computers have advanced phenomenally in power, we see them doing very little that reasonably could be called intelligent. We still can't talk to computers about the meaning of art or why Rome fell. Why? ... First, it's harder than many thought it would be. ... Another reason for the apparent lack of machine intelligence is that, if you know how a computer does something, it no longer seems intelligent. ... An example of what might be regarded as intelligent behavior is automated translation of language. This is done by Google, for example. ... Finally, the use in connection with computers of words such as 'memory,' 'language' and 'logic' raised expectations of potential human likeness that weren't supported by reality."
What tomorrow may bring - Government challenges industry to develop software to help predict terrorist actions. By Alan Joch. Homeland Security Special Supplement to Federal Computer Week (February 23, 2004). "'Pattern recognition is linked to [artificial intelligence], which was very hyped in the '70s and '80s, and that was very detrimental,' said Sameer Samat, chief technology officer at Kofax Image Products Inc., which bought pattern-recognition software maker Mohomine Inc. last year. 'For a time, if you mentioned pattern recognition, people just hung up the phone.' But new interest, based on security necessities arising after the 2001 terrorist attacks, may bring more popularity to pattern recognition."
Stuart Russell on the Future of Artificial Intelligence. Ubiquity; Volume 4, Issue 43 (December 24 - January 6, 2004). "There's a cliché that as soon as something starts to work people no longer call it AI. There's some truth to that because once it starts to work then people can explain how it works. Once the mystery is no longer there, people say that's just an algorithm. There is a misconception that AI is only AI if it has a black box that produces intelligence in a mysterious way."
A new robot makes a leap in brainpower. By Faye Flam. Philadelphia Inquirer / available from Philly.com (January 15, 2004). "[Michael] Kearns said this latest advance represented just a small part of a burst of progress in recent years in artificial intelligence and robotics. People have begun to take it for granted that computers can recognize voices and faces, give directions, sift through information on the Web, and create complicated models to predict the weather. ... Kearns, of Penn, said: 'As soon as someone gets a computer to do it, people say: 'That's not what we meant by intelligence.' People subconsciously are trying to preserve for themselves some special role in the universe.'"
Finding gold among the speculative ideas. By Mark Samuels. Computing (January 14, 2004). "The Cambridge centre is also working on leading-edge machine learning and information retrieval. Much of the research here represents a progression from the UK's strong artificial intelligence (AI) focus. 'AI has become a term that most people don't use anymore because some of the early methods didn't prove to be as scalable as people would have wanted,' says [Andrew] Herbert [managing director of Microsoft Research in Cambridge]. 'The current revolution is to look at the problems of AI as statistical problems, and find new ways of representing images and documents and use statistics to undertake classification.'"
AI Founder Blasts Modern Research. By Mark Baard. Wired News (May 13, 2003). "AI researchers also may be the victims of their own success. The public takes for granted that the Internet is searchable and that people can make airline reservations over the phone -- these are examples of AI at work. 'It's a crazy position to be in,' said Martha Pollack, a professor at the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at the University of Michigan and executive editor of the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 'As soon as we solve a problem,' said Pollack, 'instead of looking at the solution as AI, we come to view it as just another computer system.'"
Machine visionary - Author and inventor Ray Kurzweil is an authority on artificial intelligence. Interviewed by Hamish Mackintosh. The Guardian (February 6, 2003). Here's a sample of what you'll find: "[Q:] 'Is AI experiencing a renaissance?' [A:] 'We're in an era of what I'd call 'narrow AI', where systems are performing intelligent functions that used to require human intelligence. Intelligent systems can fly and land airplanes or make financial investment decisions. These were research projects 10 years ago and are now in widespread practical application and have become integrated into our information infrastructure. Every time an application works, it's no longer called AI - it becomes a separate field. It's speech recognition, character recognition, robotics, machine vision, etc.'"
Europe - Are robots after your job? After the hype, a new generation of artificial intelligence systems shows promise for solving real business problems, says Business Europe. Available from ebusinessforum.com (December 11, 2002). "This practical business focus is not the only reason AI is undergoing a renaissance. 'Today companies prefer to avoid the AI moniker,' said Shashi Buluswar, co-author of the McKinsey report. 'Now that the technology can demonstrate its applicability to real business issues where in the past its appeal was more conceptual, the term 'business intelligence' is preferred.'"
Darpa puts thought into cognitive computing. By R. Colin Johnson. EE Times (December 10, 2002). "'People say that neural networks and AI were not successful because we don't have humanoid robots walking around, but they don't realize that there are hundreds of applications of this technology that we use every day without thinking,' [Ronald] Brachman said. 'Machine-learning techniques are now built into a variety of commercial systems, finding credit card fraud, evaluating mortgage applications, detecting illegal telephone calls and recognizing speech.' He maintained that 'AI planning algorithms were successful in Desert Storm and are being used every day by the military in complicated logistic situations.'"
Artificial Intelligence. By Kristen Kennedy. Technology & Learning (November 2002). "Just as virtual reality applications have become so much a part of our daily lives we don't even recognize the science behind the display, so too have artificial intelligence-based technologies. For instance, voice and character recognition are now invaluable aids in assisting struggling readers and writers with text entry and word recognition. Script writing and recognition intelligence is powering your handheld, translating the chicken scratch of Graffiti into readable form. Toward the goal of making computers that think like humans, AI is now making new inroads into K-12 education with writing assessment engines and smart tutoring systems."
AI Center brings hi-tech degrees to University [of Georgia]. By Steve Saussy. Red and Black (September 18, 2002). "'Most people don't realize there is lots of artificial intelligence in, for example, Microsoft Windows,' [Michael] Covington said. Many people only think of robots when artificial intelligence is brought up, he said, but most of the current software available today use artificial intelligence."
Blinded by Science. By Patricia Leigh Brown. The New York Times (July 14, 2002: Week in Review, Section 4, page 3). "In his forthcoming book 'I'm Working on That: A Trek From Science Fiction to Science Fact,' William Shatner explores the reciprocity between Starship Enterprise fantasy and real-life scientific breakthroughs. 'What was suggested 30 years ago in 'Star Trek' is now old hat,' he said in a telephone interview. ... As a culture, we have become writers of our own fantasy saga in which pacemakers, cloning, the Internet, speech recognition software and the like are merely part of the scenery."
The return of artificial intelligence. By Corey Booth and Shashi Buluswar. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2002 Number 2 Web exclusive (no-fee reg. req'd). "Artificial intelligence (AI) has come in and out of vogue more times than Madonna in the past 20 years: it has been hyped and then, having failed to live up to the hype, been discredited until being revived again. In the late 1990s, an observer at a World Wide Web technology conference reported that most of the proposals there had been floated, several years earlier, under the AI moniker and were now being recycled - good technology solutions looking for real business problems to solve."
Lord of the Robots: Q&A with Rodney Brooks. Technology Review (April 2002). "TR: What is the state of A.I. research? BROOKS: There's this stupid myth out there that A.I. has failed, but A.I. is everywhere around you every second of the day. People just don't notice it. You've got A.I. systems in cars, tuning the parameters of the fuel injection systems. When you land in an airplane, your gate gets chosen by an A.I. scheduling system. Every time you use a piece of Microsoft software, you've got an A.I. system trying to figure out what you're doing, like writing a letter, and it does a pretty damned good job. Every time you see a movie with computer-generated characters, they're all little A.I. characters behaving as a group. Every time you play a video game, you're playing against an A.I. system."
AI
by another name. The Economist (March 14, 2002). "Ironically, in some
ways, AI was a victim of its own success. Whenever an apparently mundane
problem was solved, such as building a system that could land an aircraft
unattended, or read handwritten postcodes to speed mail sorting, the
problem was deemed not to have been AI in the first place. 'If it works,
it can't be AI,' as Dr Leake characterises it. The effect of repeatedly
moving the goal-posts in this way was that AI came to refer to blue-sky
research that was still years away from commercialisation. Researchers
joked that AI stood for 'almost implemented'. Meanwhile, the technologies
that worked well enough to make it on to the market, such as speech
recognition, language translation and decision-support software, were no
longer regarded as AI. Yet all three once fell well within the umbrella of
AI research. ... Not everyone is rushing to embrace this once-stigmatised
term, however. ...Max Thiercy, head of development at Albert, a French
firm that produces natural-language search software, also avoids the term
AI. 'I consider the term a bit obsolete,' he says. 'It can make our
customers frightened.' This seems odd, because the firm's search
technology uses a classic AI technique, applying multiple algorithms to
the same data, and then evaluates the results to see which approach was
most effective. Even so, the firm prefers to use such terms as 'natural
language processing' and 'machine learning'."
It's
Alive! From airport tarmacs to online job banks to medical labs, AI is
everywhere. By Jennifer Kahn. 
WIRED (March 2002 / 10.03; pages 72 - 77). "Quietly,
though, AI researchers were making more than progress - they were making
products. It's a trend that's been easy to miss, because once the
technology is in use, nobody thinks of it as AI anymore. 'Every time we
figure out a piece of it, it stops being magical; we say, 'Oh, that's just
a computation,' laments Rodney Brooks, the director of MIT's Artificial
Intelligence Laboratory. ... In truth, we may never chat up a computer at
a cocktail party. But in smaller yet significant ways, artificial
intelligence is already here: in the cruise control of cars... The future
is all around us."
Computers try to outthink terrorists. By Bruce V. Bigelow. The San Diego Union-Tribune (January 13, 2002). Also available from UC San Diego. "Once known as 'artificial intelligence' -- a term that many computer scientists disdain -- such technology now is used to detect fraudulent financial transactions, such as money laundering, and to monitor industrial processes for irregularities."
Trapped In The Future - How Long Before AI Apps Really Hit Their Stride? By William Van Winkle. Computer Power User. Volume 2, Issue 1 (January 2002): pages 50-54 in print issue. "In fact, AI -- or what was once considered AI until it became commonplace -- is now almost everywhere."
Almost Human? Artificial Intelligence is back in the hearts and minds of technology gurus. By Robert J. Derocher. Insight (The Magazine of the Illinois CPA Society, September 2001) ---> "'Software is just getting smarter and smarter and smarter.' [Carol] Brown agrees, saying that accounting firms have 'integrated AI into their normal software, so they don't think about it as AI anymore.'"
On the bleeding edge? Call 911, or a VAD. An editorial by Alison Eastwood. CBiz Magazine (Channel Business, formerly Canadian Computer Reseller; May 26, 1999). "I asked a woman at a systems management software development firm whether her company's solution used AI to diagnose problems. [Pause.] 'We don't like to use the words 'artificial intelligence,'' she said brightly. Oh? Well, how about the words 'neural networks'? 'Uh, no. Because it means so many different things, and then we get all these technical people asking us what algorithms we use.'" - Editorial:
"Our expectations for a technology rise with its advancement." - Henry Petroski. From page 83 of his book, The Evolution of Useful Things. (New York: Vintage Books, 1994). [From our collection of quotations.]
The Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference. By Bruce Buchanan and Sam Uthurusamy. AI Magazine 20(1): Spring 1999, 11-12. "One measure of the growth of practical applications is the number of U.S. patents mentioning the term artificial intelligence and related terms (knowledge based, fuzzy logic, expert system, genetic algorithm). According to the primary examiner for AI in the U.S. Patent Office, Robert Downs, a decade ago only about 100 patents mentioned AI specifically; last year, about 1700 mentioned artificial intelligence, with another 3900 or so mentioning related terms. About 2200 patents are specifically classified in the Patent Office's class for artificial intelligence, which means that the invention or technique is specifically directed to something new in knowledge-based systems, machine learning, fuzzy logic, or neural networks. Other patents using AI techniques might be classified in an area of application such as medicine. These numbers confirm another important trend, which was noted by Reid Smith and others in the context of earlier IAAI conferences: AI technology is more likely to be embedded in some larger system than embodied in a stand-alone system. The difference between the 5600 patents mentioning AI and the 2200 specifically classified as AI is about 3400 patents in which AI contributes something in a larger context. ... Successful applications of AI are part of, and buried in, larger systems that probably do not carry the label AI inside." [Emphasis added.]
Thoughts About Artificial Intelligence. By Marvin Minsky. From Ray Kurzweil's 1990 book, The Age of Intelligent Machines. "AI research has made enormous progress in only a few decades, and because of that rapidity, the field has acquired a somewhat shady reputation! This paradox resulted from the fact that whenever an AI research project made a useful new discovery, that product usually quickly spun off to form a new scientific or commercial specialty with its own distinctive name. These changes in name led outsiders to ask, Why do we see so little progress in the central field of artificial intelligence?"